Neo-Mickey

Want to share your Moho work? Post it here.

Moderators: Víctor Paredes, Belgarath, slowtiger

User avatar
J. Baker
Posts: 1063
Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2005 7:22 pm
Location: USA
Contact:

Post by J. Baker »

That was great! I would like to see a higher quality version myself. :wink:
User avatar
jordanek
Posts: 23
Joined: Wed May 25, 2005 8:51 pm
Contact:

Post by jordanek »

Aaaah! The animation was taken off YouTube before I got a chance to take a look. Is there anywhere else the video can still be viewed?
User avatar
x-vishon
Posts: 74
Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2006 5:52 pm

Post by x-vishon »

Me too. I wanted too see it. Damn.
User avatar
Rasheed
Posts: 2008
Joined: Tue May 17, 2005 8:30 am
Location: The Netherlands

Post by Rasheed »

Some blogs predicted a rapid cease and desist from Disney's Lawyers. Since YouTube has been bought by Google, this is rather the rule than the exception, unfortunately. How narrow-minded of the Disney management, if this is true :(
User avatar
jhbmw007
Posts: 382
Joined: Thu Feb 15, 2007 5:41 am

Post by jhbmw007 »

Yea- same reason I can't find Steamboat Willie anywhere. Take this Disney!:
http://artpad.art.com/gallery/?jeeay21okk

I think I made his body too long- I mean- whoever drew him... Anyone feel like finishing coloring him in? just click add to this painting ;)
User avatar
Rasheed
Posts: 2008
Joined: Tue May 17, 2005 8:30 am
Location: The Netherlands

Post by Rasheed »

Well, it seems that trademark law is such, that as long as they want to use the Mickey Mouse trademark, they have to actively protect it by all legal means possible. However, I haven't seen any recent mouse animation coming from Disney. So, why don't they use the Mouse to create enjoyable animation?
User avatar
Captain Jack
Posts: 37
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 2:11 pm
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Contact:

Post by Captain Jack »

Rasheed wrote:Well, it seems that trademark law is such, that as long as they want to use the Mickey Mouse trademark, they have to actively protect it by all legal means possible. However, I haven't seen any recent mouse animation coming from Disney. So, why don't they use the Mouse to create enjoyable animation?
The answer to all questions that begin "Why don't they..." is almost always "money". :)

Disney has always been very aggressive about defending their copyrights and trademarks, even going so far as to lobby hard to get US law changed to extend the term of protection. The original intent of copyright protection was really to protect artists and writers during their lifetimes, but not much more. The way things stand now, Disney characters may not enter the public domain for many decades, or even centuries. If they ever do at all.
User avatar
Touched
Posts: 504
Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 7:33 am
Location: Sunny California
Contact:

Post by Touched »

I think I'd have to sympathise with Disney on that matter. Even if Walt himself is dead, his company is still alive. Why should Disney characters become public domain while there's still value in them for the company? Walt hasn't even been dead for 50 years, yet.
User avatar
Rasheed
Posts: 2008
Joined: Tue May 17, 2005 8:30 am
Location: The Netherlands

Post by Rasheed »

For anyone interested, there is a good article on answers.com about Mickey Mouse. It has a section on legal issues as well.
User avatar
Squeakydave
Posts: 328
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2004 9:44 pm
Location: UK - London-ish
Contact:

Post by Squeakydave »

Gah! missed it.
Nice one Barry and Michael good to know you are both alive and kicking. (I remember Michael from the Film Garage days!)

Lovely designs. There should be way more of that sort of thing animated. :D
The400th
Posts: 177
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 3:51 pm

Post by The400th »

THIS is the kind of animation that MOHO (not AS. Moho) lends itself to superbly.
Why do you say that about AS, Mikdog? Why do you think Moho is better than AS? Or are you calling the Pro version Moho? Just curious.
User avatar
Touched
Posts: 504
Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 7:33 am
Location: Sunny California
Contact:

Post by Touched »

I think he's echoing the sentiment that Moho is a better name than Anime Studio. Moho is distinctive but unclear in purpose, Anime Studio is generic but descriptive. Moho is easy to type, Anime Studio has the awkward acronym AS or ASP. I say they should combine the names, call it Moho Anime Studio. Distinctive and descriptive, and you can just call it Moho.
User avatar
Captain Jack
Posts: 37
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 2:11 pm
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Contact:

Post by Captain Jack »

Perhaps e-Frontier found that in one of their international markets, the word Moho, when pronounced phonetically, means something unpleasant in the local tongue, and is concerned about the potential for embarassment. :)
User avatar
slowtiger
Posts: 6104
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2006 6:53 pm
Location: Berlin, Germany
Contact:

Post by slowtiger »

I can just say that Anime, Animestudio, Animo, and animation make a fine mess when referred to in the same talk. The six syllables of AnimeStudio are a pain in the ... tongue.
User avatar
Captain Jack
Posts: 37
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 2:11 pm
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Contact:

Post by Captain Jack »

I actually have trouble with it when typing... when I make a folder on my hard drive for it, or I talk about it in a forum or e-mail, my fingers keep wanting to type "Animation Studio" instead of "Anime Studio".

Well, I've lived through having teenage children, I guess I can get used to just about anything. :lol:
Post Reply