Moderators: Fahim, Distinct Sun, Víctor Paredes, erey, Belgarath, slowtiger
Psmith wrote:
synthsin75 wrote:But to each their own.
exile wrote:synthsin75 wrote:But to each their own.
Why so dismissive of a good animation?
synthsin75 wrote:Not dismissive of the animation, OT just seems more complex than Moho. But I understand if people need to seek out free or more fully fleshed out FBF software.
exile wrote:synthsin75 wrote:Not dismissive of the animation, OT just seems more complex than Moho. But I understand if people need to seek out free or more fully fleshed out FBF software.
Actually, AS/Moho is not all that easy, either. For example: Not long ago I bought a Udemy course on AS 11. The instructor was having all kinds of trouble getting things to work. In one video he messed up his character so badly it couldn't be repaired anymore. He just left it unedited online, by the way. You'd never catch Greg doing that, although his stuff is free. And he seems to give a damn about those people you mention who struggle to make ends meet.
Anime Studio is also an "I did that once, how does that go again" kind of software, especially if you have to take a break from it for a while. That's one reason why the forum is vital for it.
Before making any quick judgements, I plan to take a thorough look at what Toonz does well and where it has weaknesses. I'm looking forward to more interesting videos.
Psmith wrote:...additive cycles (I don't think they are working properly with Pin Bones - since aspects of their influence are magnified over time).
...
Moho 12 also does not fall into the "inexpensive" category any longer either.
TzaTza4love wrote:I don't think OpenToonz is nearly as good as Toon Boom Harmony. It is pretty good if you like to draw your animation on paper and composite the film with a computer.
I would use OpenToonz if all the software I love became subscription only. I love that it is pretty powerful for a free animation software.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest