Is the mute channel function unclear?

General Moho topics.

Moderators: Víctor Paredes, Belgarath, slowtiger

Post Reply

Is the red dot enough or would you prefer something else?

I like the dot
2
29%
I prefer a lock symbol
0
No votes
Grey out the channel and icon.
3
43%
Something else.
1
14%
What 'mute' feature? I never even saw it.
0
No votes
I'm not sure, I'll go with the consensus.
1
14%
 
Total votes: 7
chucky
Posts: 4650
Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 4:24 am

Is the mute channel function unclear?

Post by chucky »

It seems a few people are tripping up on the mute feature.
Although it's all explained in the manual ( I assume :P ) it may be easy to miss , when looking at the UI.
I've been caught a couple of times ( not badly) but I can see that it might be annoying for confusing for some.
What do you think, is the dot clear enough or could the mute be more obvious?
Keeping in mind precious UI space. :)
User avatar
Greenlaw
Posts: 9259
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2006 5:45 pm
Location: Los Angeles
Contact:

Re: Is the mute channel function unclear?

Post by Greenlaw »

I like the dot but it could be bigger. Personally, the international 'no' symbol (slashed circle) would make more sense.

A lock symbol wouldn't make sense to me. A lock should lock the layer (which I wish we could do natively,) not mute it.
User avatar
Greenlaw
Posts: 9259
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2006 5:45 pm
Location: Los Angeles
Contact:

Re: Is the mute channel function unclear?

Post by Greenlaw »

I mentioned this before but what would be useful to me is the option to have the renderer ignore mute settings. This would prevent users from submitting 'bad' renders because they forgot to disable the mutes. (I don't think I'm the only one who keeps doing that.) :)

I think I recently mentioned a variation that may have been better, but I'll have to look that up.
User avatar
synthsin75
Posts: 9968
Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 11:20 pm
Location: Oklahoma
Contact:

Re: Is the mute channel function unclear?

Post by synthsin75 »

Yeah, I wouldn't want something that took up more UI space.

And I don't really think the icon is the problem, since there's no way to indicate when a channel has been muted in an action while you're on the mainline, or even when you're just on a different layer. It's not like a generic warning would help much, since it wouldn't tell you which specific layers/actions/channels are muted. And trying to make a comprehensive warning with all that info might be annoying for those who have already learned the software.

I always just make note layers to remind myself what I've muted.

Granted, new users always manage to hit some option they didn't know what it did and causes them trouble later. That's just part of learning, IMO. Maybe the problem is that it's too easy to accidentally mute a channel while clicking the channel icon to select all its keys? If so, I wouldn't want to make it harder to access, but maybe it should be to the left of the channel icon or something.



I would agree with needing an option to have the render ignore mute settings, Dennis, especially if it included options to selectively apply to render, preview, and export separately.
User avatar
hayasidist
Posts: 3514
Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2011 8:12 pm
Location: Kent, England

Re: Is the mute channel function unclear?

Post by hayasidist »

The trap I fell into was that I'd accidently muted a channel in a smartbone action, but muted channels aren't muted in an action (I hope that will soon be 'used not to be muted in an action') --> the animation runs in the action, but not in mainline -- made even more confusing because the muted channel didn't appear in mainline (the only place the object was animated was in the action): IOW there was *nothing* in mainline to show that the channel was a) there and b) muted. So with that "fix" it will be more obvious that channels are muted - i.e. the "something else" is that muted channels are always muted whether scrubbing the timeline in mainline or actions.

I can see why it would be good not to have channels muted in rendering - and right now I can't think of a practical situation where you might need to have something rendered with less that all of its animation switched on - but things such as muting colour changes because you need a mask (??) might be useful, so my own vote for that would be to make it a layer comp option - IOW if you just "render" then all channels are animated (mute is ignored) but if you have a layer comp option to "render with muted channels muted" that, IMO, ought to cover all eventualities.

I agree with the desire to minimise use of real estate in the timeline; so I think I'd go for a UI redesign - Mute / Unmute becomes a right-click option on the channel -- lose the dot entirely -- and grey out the channel icon when muted.
User avatar
synthsin75
Posts: 9968
Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 11:20 pm
Location: Oklahoma
Contact:

Re: Is the mute channel function unclear?

Post by synthsin75 »

hayasidist wrote:I agree with the desire to minimise use of real estate in the timeline; so I think I'd go for a UI redesign - Mute / Unmute becomes a right-click option on the channel -- lose the dot entirely -- and grey out the channel icon when muted.
When I need muting, I seem to use it a lot...lot of muting/unmuting. So I'd rather it not add to my clicks by being a right-click command.
Post Reply